On May 6, 5:07*pm, K1TTT wrote:
On May 6, 12:58*am, Art Unwin wrote:



The fundamental question: Are radio waves a simple electric waves or the
very sophisticated Maxwell's waves?

ALL radio waves can be described by maxwell's equations, both simple
linear polarized ones and circularly polarized ones.

The fundamental question is really how can we describe this "wave".? A
wave of what "water",
A wave of "water" traveling towards a beach.
Is it water we are really trying to describe or what?
Water has a "skin" on its surface , a skin that encasulates it like a
bag , container or a boundary!
Nothing is clear when describing a "wave" with respect to physics, as
it is just a "F" word to substitute an unexplainable in a psuedo
description
There is no agreement what so ever as to what a "wave" is so there
cannot *exist a description of what radio "IS", "IS"!. Physicists
acknowledge that radio is some thing that is unexplanable leaving just
hams to fill in the unexplainable about radio and to deny the
explanations made by others.
What we do have is a string of mathematical equations all of which
interlock which are a result
of observation and seamingly reasonable deductions. Maxwell deduced b
y examination of units used that a portion of his formula was also a
mathematical explanation of elevation and acceleration but no
description of what! A physicists
named Gauss who provided a lot of Maxwells tools
used Newtons laws to establish boundary laws where it can be seen that
mathematically a clump of static particles in equilibrium could be
made
dynamic by adding a time varying field while retaining equilibrium
meshes with Maxwells equations on radiation. So who on earth descided
to interject "waves" into the discussion and why?
And what experiment was performed that dictated its inclusion in the
subject of radio or radiation that has put a screaming halt to a
sustainable explanation of same for more than a hundred years
where other dreams have come to fruition by utelizing the human brain.
Is it the ham population
that is responsible for the lack of advances in the advancement of
science by denying the inclusion of particles as the basic matter
involved in elevation and acceleration (displacement) as implied by
Maxwell's equations, preferring instead to use 'water' and 'waves' to
describe the science to the non initiated.

maxwell's equations do not describe particle motion, they describe
electric and magnetic fields and electromagnetic waves. *as i just
tried to point out to mr. b, the elementary school analogy of water
waves to explain electromagnetic waves must be abandoned before you
can truly understand em waves.

I am happy about that but it doesn't help me to understand em waves or
where they are involved with Maxwell. It is inbuilt in physics that we
are accelerating a charge where acceleration demands
mass. But there is no continuation of explanation beyond that point.
Every theory since classical has broken down and we are now in the
superstring theory while at the same time trying to collide the
smallest particle on earth which determines the speed of light. You
definitely can not involve acceleration without mass, and gravity can
only be canceled by a reactionary vecto r being involved and you
cannot have a straight line trajectory without two vectors
representing gravity and its associated spin. Frankly, we should
start again using the basics of Newton as used by Maxwell
and then backtracking to the time of Einstein by supplying the
relationship of static and dynamic fields so that frausteration did
not drive us away from former progress in physics over the centuries
to invent particles without mass, anti particles and acceleration of
string which can take on the shape of a wave.
What startles me is the acceptance of computer programs based on
Maxwell which clearly show that the radiating member must have zero
resistance for maximum radiation. That radiation resistance implies
that of an encapsulating
substance which is elevated and accelerated by the action of
displacement current in a similar manner to scrap metal sorting yards.
Now I read that present particle science is retracting to the idea of
a single particle being the source of the standard model and where the
existing environment is creating the observences at any point in time
based on the existance of matter in all cases. It is time we reverted
back to the demands of equilibrium where an "equal" sign
addition to any equation demands that the addition
of all used in that equation must equal zero. Which is a staple of all
that is used by the human race over the centuries. Not one of many
theorems on radio have come to fruition with the use of integra ated
solutions to satisfy the whole. All we have are totally disconnected
imaginations spawned by using mathematical tricks of doubtful merit
with imaginary inventions to fill in the inevitable gaps.
We only have one tool that is solidly connected to equations of
maxwell and that is the computer programs with optimizer that adheres
solely to the stated equation together with adherence to equilibrium.
What better place exists to delve further into the Masters thoughts
rather than the manufacture of another theorem?