On May 7, 12:15*am, Art Unwin wrote:
What better place exists to delve further into the Masters thoughts
rather than the manufacture of another theorem?

To justify another theorem you must do a couple things:
1. predict something that is not currently predicted.
2. explain all known phenomenon at least as well as existing laws/
theories.

In order to do both of those you must be quantitative. Provide exact
equations that combine what is predicted by maxwell with your magical
levitating colored bosons from the sun, show the link to the earth
rotation precisely so the tipping effect can be calculated and proven
or disproved by an experiment, explain why diamagnetic materials must
be used and what happens differently if you use paramagnetic or
ferromagnetic materials in a form that can be measured... but these
all require equations, not handwaving general statements about the big
bang and your magical equilibrium.