View Single Post
  #18   Report Post  
Old May 21st 10, 02:16 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.politics.elections,alt.news-media,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
dave dave is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default "Enough Money"

bpnjensen wrote:

- Show quoted text -


I won;r argue the basic point, although I have my reservations...but
assuming this is correct...

With one cautionary note -

When people are land-rich and money-poor (forest owners, ranchers,
farmers, wetland owners, other fundamentally responsible stewards), a
large inheritance tax frequently forces the inheritor (who legally has
no choice) to rapidly liquidate the good land to pay the tax bill -
sometimes farmland, sometimes natural habitat or even de facto
wilderness, and this turns it into subdivisons or other nonproductive,
non-habitat land. This unintended consequence has been repeated
countless times, and some provision should be made to forestall this
problem.


This can be a consequence but it doesn't have to be.