View Single Post
  #196   Report Post  
Old May 27th 10, 08:22 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
K1TTT K1TTT is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 484
Default Computer model experiment

On May 27, 5:29*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
Uzytkownik "K1TTT" napisal w ...
On May 27, 8:27 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

In plasma physics are particles.

S*
well, at least you have one sentence that says something true.


And are this true: "We also assumed, perfectly arbitrarily, that the
direction of these vortices is such that, on looking along a line of force
from south to north, we should see the vortices revolving in the direc- tion
of the hands of a watch. We found that the velocity of the circumference of
each vortex must be proportional to the intensity of the magnetic force, and
that the density of the substance of the vortex must be propor- tional to
the capacity of the medium for magnetic induction." From:http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_Phy...Lines_of_Force

"the density of the substance of the vortex "
As you see in Maxwell's hypothesis was the mass. The all waves need mass and
inertia.
But all movements (also waves) can be described dynamically (with mass) or
geometrically (only directions and speed).
The famous Heaviside's equations are the geometrical description of the
waves.
S*


as has already been pointed out this paper predates the publication of
the full set of maxwell's equations, and even the publication of
gauss' law... so much development was done in em theories after that
date. just because something is written down doesn't make it right or
we would still be living with 4 elements and letting blood to cure
disease.