View Single Post
  #156   Report Post  
Old June 6th 10, 09:40 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Keith Dysart[_2_] Keith Dysart[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2007
Posts: 492
Default Question about "Another look at reflections" article.

On Jun 6, 9:55*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
On Jun 5, 6:33*pm, Keith Dysart wrote:

This simplified form works for sinusoids. It is derived from
P(t)=V(t)I(t),
but loses information since the result is just the average value.


Note that P(t)=V(t)I(t) is just Pfor(t) - Pref(t) which loses
information when the subtraction is performed and is not important in
any meaningful way. If, as you say, loss of information is to be
avoided, you should be using Pfor(t) and Pref(t) instead of net P(t).
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com


In the past you have insisted that only average powers were relevent.
Does this mean you are ready to look at power (i.e. energy flow) in
the
time domain?

If so, you might appreciate
http://sites.google.com/site/keithdysart/radio6.

....Keith