On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:19:59 -0700 (PDT), K7ITM wrote:

As Wim has pointed out, requiring an amplifier to be loaded and driven
in a very particular way unnecessarily dismisses some very important
classes of amplifier.

This is the standard rebuff with "the rest of the world works
differently" distractions to Walt having stated a premise, described
initial conditions, taken measurements, and having shown the data
supports his hypothesis. The hypothesis is dismissed through shifting
initial conditions to suit an avoidance of committing an honest answer
to Walt's specific and very explicit observation.

Walt, if this community were pressed for an "up or down" vote:

"Does Walt's data support the evidence of a Conjugate Match?"

then you would be out in the weeds with your only supporting vote from
me (and maybe from others who would do this by email).

I doubt this will set off a stampede to the ballot box, but what few
votes are stuffed in, I bet they will have the "up or down" stapled to
a dissertation of "however...."

To this last, if I sinned in that regard, I used only Walt's data, his
equipment references, and his citation sources. As no one else seems
to tread that narrow path, much less commit beyond grandiose
statements, I don't feet too bad.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC