Owen Duffy wrote in
:
....
At Step 8, he substitutes a load with measured impedance and
calculated rho^2 as 0.235, VSWR(50) is approximately 3. Reported
Pf=95W, Pr=25W, and on that basis rho^2=0.263. The discrepency in rho
is not discussed in the paper.
I have made an error here, Walt reports Pf=95W,
Pr=20W, and on that basis
rho^2=0.211. The discrepency in rho is not discussed in the paper.
The error has no impact on the rest of my post.
My apologies.
Owen