On Jun 25, 8:39*pm, Mike wrote:
On Jun 25, 11:26*pm, Gregg wrote:



On Jun 25, 10:59*pm, Mike wrote:

On Jun 25, 10:32*pm, Mike wrote:

On Jun 25, 9:33*pm, Gregg wrote:

You can hear 15.415 with regularity (depending on your definition)
here in SW Ohio if you have a good antenna and good receiver. A tad
tougher but not what I would consider huge. But maybe that's because I
hear them all the time shrug and not putting down his catch either,
so don't go there.

[Rolling my eyes and laughing]

Hey, Gregg, post some more logs, so we can be amazed at the
frequency calibration of your outstanding receiver and antenna.
You started this crap again....

What crap? I'm not allowed to state the truth? I didn't start
anything, I wasn't even talking to you or about you. I just mentioned
RA at that time and on the freq. - just because I didn't say "wow -
Mike great catch" etc. etc. you get all ****ed at me? Again, it shows
your nature and what you are going to bring back here whenever someone
either questions you or doesn't applaud you. Kind of like someone I
know in RK. You aren't going to change, that proved it right
there....like I needed proof anyway. Ha! sheesh- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And I'm willing to bet that your "easy" R. Australia catch is on
15515,
given your mis-qouted frequencies in the past. You took offense to me
*even posting in your thread, won't even post logs, and call RA's
Indonesian broadcast on 19 meters at 0500 UTC "easy". You are
a hopeless liar. Just tell folks what your receiver is. Bet you won't,
because you'd be laughed at....

Trolling is what you do best, Gregg.

Mike

If'n - I ain't wearing my reading glasses the
Digital Frequency Display on my Radios
sort of looks like 8888.888 a bunch of
blurry eights and the Digital Clocks ain't
much better.

hard to sleep with the reading glasses on
and hard to see the radio's numbers with
them off - that's why i like a tuning knob
no reading glasses required ~ RHF