On 5 jul, 14:20, lu6etj wrote:
On 5 jul, 10:16, Cecil Moore wrote:





On Jul 4, 8:26*pm, Keith Dysart wrote:

Are you suggesting that an
open circuited transmission line excited with a step function takes
infinitely long to read steady state?

Your infinitely long open-circuited transmission line example
certainly takes infinitely long to reach steady-state so the leading-
edge EM wave continues forever with zero reflected EM waves and your
argument involving reflected waves falls apart.

Your finite open-circuited transmission line example reaches DC steady-
state where EM waves cease to exist so your argument involving forward
and reflected waves falls apart.
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com

Hi Richard, good day:

Again you give me another rethoric answer... Please, tell us how to
measure to distinguish Osc. A *from *Osc. B, having Osc. A 4*10^28
quanta and Osc. B 4*10^28 +1 quanta, having each 80 m quantum 2.3 *
10^-19 J.

Your answers are making me remember = "It was the only explicit
answer you will ever get" or "Superman's cataracts with his xray
vision. *This is probably going to be your only direct
answer." (Please do not go upsetting, I am joking).

You dislike my examples, you dislike R & H & K classic and obviously
really good peer reviewed book reference (and examples), you dislike
university notes, you dislike analogies, you dislike Sagan... Today I
know all things you dislike, what I do not know is how measure A and B
oscillator to distinguish each other... :D
Remember, you are rebutting things stated in standard university
physics book, does not reverse the burden of proof.
Please be a good boy, be plain and do not resort to old tricks such as
posting esoteric rocket science hiper-specialized incomprehensible
answers :)

73 Miguel Ghezzi - LU6ETJ- Ocultar texto de la cita -

- Mostrar texto de la cita -

SRI, I ommited to say the example of the University of New Mexico link
it is similar to the one given in "Physics for scientists and
engineers" (Serway & Beichner, my copy is in spanish). They say the
same about it.

Humoroues note: Richard Feynman do not share your dislike for
analogies he compare corks in water with charged objects fields :)