View Single Post
  #51   Report Post  
Old July 19th 10, 11:02 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.religion.christian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default (OT) : The Obama Battery - Now That's Green - NOT !

On Jul 18, 10:29*am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote:
On 7/17/2010 8:24 PM, Brenda Ann wrote:



"Beam Me Up Scotty" wrote in
...


* * Solar, Hydrogen and even Hydro are the
better answers -not- Batteries of any kind


Hydrogen.... exhausts water vapor, water vapor is more of a greenhouse
gas by your standards than CO2.


If you drive enough cars through the desert you will raise the humidity
which is the "Water Vapor" that will increase all the dry parts of the
world to have more water vapor and that is more greenhouse gas.


Your Solution is worse than the problem.... * The cure is worse than the
disease.


While you could have made the argument that it would help the USA be
energy self sufficient and that is a good thing, you leftists try to use
the silly *Global Warming myth* as your basis and in that realm it makes
no more sense than Global Warming its self.


Water vapor is indeed a short term greenhouse gas.. but there is one major
difference between water vapor and, say, CO2. *Water vapor precipitates out
of the atmosphere in a regular cycle.


CO2 is filtered by plants.

The residual heat is what you claim as the DANGER.

It's called 'rain'.


How will you remove the heat? * Why build cars that create a volatile
temperature?

It also
precipitates out nightly in the form of dew as the humidity reaches 100%.
Water vapor does not STAY in the atmosphere permanently.


- My point being that the 30% to 99% rise

You 'point' is trying to Count the Number of Angels
on the Head of a Pin - When the question is :

What Do You Think of the Mona Lisa . . .
http://www.bloglifetime.com/images/b...-mona-lisa.jpg