View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 3rd 10, 09:42 AM posted to ba.broadcast,alt.radio.digital,rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default iBiquity finally under investigation - LMFAO!!!!!!

On Sep 2, 8:49*pm, "Drewdove" wrote:
"Richard Evans" wrote in message

...



DigitalRadioScams wrote:
On Sep 2, 4:05 pm, Richard Evans
wrote:
If they wanted to use the FM band, they may have been better off using

DRM+.

Much more spectrally efficient.
Likely to provide better sound quality.
The only licensing requirement is for decoding of aac+.
Better control of which frequencies to use, hence more chance of
avoiding interference to FM services.


No one is interested in buing digital radios.


Perhaps not. But if they are going to try and sell them to people, they
could at least have tried selling then a descent system.


- I couldn't agree more especially since 76-88MHz
- may be opening up in the US for radio broadcasting
- due to these frequencies proving poor for HDTV.

yes, Yes. YES ! - Expand the FM Radio Band
-by- Moving AM's to Old TV Channels 5 & 6 !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...403d27fe07c27f
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...eec9db49629a49
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...56e4adae3ab587
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...ba020aff11f5f0
"Expanded" FM Radio Band to cover 76 MHz to
88 MHz to create and additional 60 FM Channels.