View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Old September 6th 10, 01:18 AM posted to ba.broadcast,alt.radio.digital,rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default Other automakers with HD Radio liable, too?

On Sep 5, 11:56*am, SMS wrote:
On 9/5/2010 9:50 AM, Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:

The big boys pushed IBOC because they wanted to do whatever they could
to _prevent_ the creation of a new all-digital band. They feared that
such a new band would level the playing field so the small broadcaster
would have just as good coverage as they did. That was an intolerable
and frightening idea to them.


That's part of it, but they also did not want to have to pay for the
additional spectrum on a new band.

- For all the misinformation that our favorite troll promulgates here,
the
- fact is that FM IBOC works very well indeed. There have been very
few
- complaints about interference, and the few complaints that there
were,
- were found to have no merit because the interference occurred
outside
- the protected contour (though this was before the power increase was
- granted).

That is because FM Radio has a well defined and
'limited' Broadcast Service Area unlike AM Radio;
which can go far farther then authorized on a nightly
basis each and every night.

Plus FM Radio has NO large legacy culture of DXers
and DXing like the AM/MW Radio Band has/had for
many decades.

few search for distant voices . . .
on the fm radio band ~ RHF