View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
Old September 10th 10, 04:33 AM posted to ba.broadcast,alt.radio.digital,rec.radio.shortwave,aus.radio.broadcast,rec.radio.amateur.misc
dave dave is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default Keefe Bartels investigation into HD Radio picking up steam -LMFAO!!!

DigitalRadioScams wrote:
On Sep 9, 7:08 pm, John wrote:
On 9/9/2010 4:11 PM, dave wrote:

...
aac at 256 kbps still sounds like crap compared to FLAC or WAV.


Well, that is because you are like that damn princess which could detect
a pea placed under her mattress! You are special, special ed ... err,
special dave ... to the rest of us, am radio at 64 kbps sounds great, 32
ain't bad and 16 will suffice ... at 128 kbps I doubt there is even any
loss at all ... only one with special ed (special dave) abilities is
made uncomfortable! ROFLOL

Regards,
JS


Subject restored...


128 sounds very ragged to me. It's fine for the car or background music
but when I put on my Grado headphones the lossy compression is not
really a pleasure to listen to.