SPECIAL : US Constitution Intentionally Vague About Spanking. . . {Tough Love}
Grendel wrote:
On Sep 15, 10:04 am, wrote:
On Sep 15, 6:47 am, wrote:
On Sep 15, 8:28 am, wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Sep 14, 1:30 pm, wrote:
- He says there's no violence in schools,
- but also brags that parents hit their children,
- another form of violence.
'Special Dave' was it done in rage and anger . . .
or out of love and goodness ?
It is wrong to strike another, except when in fear of immediate threat
to life and limb.
Well, I have to say, that can be ranked as the most idiotic,
simplistic, ignorant and outright bull**** statement made on the
internet today.
Yol Bolsun,
Grendel.
Your rationale is noted.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Rationale? The ignorance and bull**** factor of that statement is
self explanatory to anyone with a functioning brain.
But as both of you seem to lack that functioning brain, I will gladly
explain just a little of the rationale as to why the statement is
bull****.
First:
For the statement to be even close to accurate, it would have to be
morally reprehensible to spank a child, and it is far from it. You
may not agree with it, but your narrow viewpoint does not dictate the
morals for everyone. (and before you ask, I have found the need to
spank my children.)
Second:
The following activities that involve physical contact would have to
be banned on moral grounds, also:
-Martial Arts
-Taekwondo,
-Jujutsu,
-Karate
-Boxing of all kinds,
I can live with that. It is wrong to use violence to teach.
|