On 16 sep, 00:14, Richard Clark wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 18:43:51 -0700 (PDT), lu6etj
wrote:

why to ask more?

Because everthing else was "magic" to you. *Strange sort of
limitation, but there you are with a less than satisfactory answer.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


No, this form of question "why to ask more?" it is ironic, in spanish
means that "you", not me, do not want to ask more. You stop the
questioning in a high level (as in software "high level" meaning)
useful descriptive model of the world and refuse to look for the
underlying process responsible of that. "Magic" for me it is = PRINT
"hello world", because beneath it is asm code for PRINT instruction,
more deep it is movement of bits inside the processor, more lower yet
it is the electricity. To explain all program operations perhaps we do
not need go beyond PRINT statement knowledge, but BASIC it is not the
end of the story...

Why do you think only you study boundary conditions...? it is the more
conventional form to treat the issue of reflections! All this speech
to refute accelerated electrolite charges radiation? Do better shows
to us why a ion vibrating due an electric field it is incapable to
radiate EM energy. Better yet, shows us that you has replicated the
paper's experiment and has got nil results. Until today we have only
scholastic rationalizations, not "bench work".
You said: "well... it is not so good as copper conductor, then it is
no good for me", that is not science! that is only your tastes :P You
do not want study or analize technical possibilities with your ham
fellows, you like quarreling!, hi hi, Be a good boy, dust off your
undergraduated Resnick and see Compton thinkings, interesting things
happen at the bottom :)

73 - Miguel