On Sep 17, 12:12*am, RHF wrote:
On Sep 16, 4:40*pm, John Smith wrote:





On 9/16/2010 4:18 PM, CaltechPhD wrote:

* ...

That is not what I wrote. *I stated that it took a lot less time to
get a PhD in science and engineering (true 20 years ago, and probably
still true). *I drew the conclusion that it is easier to get a
doctorate in a technical field. *I did not write anyting abot IQ.

Don't make me responsible for anything you write or don't. *Don't
question if I care what you write, or what you don't; *I won't and I don't.

My previous post states what I find the facts you state prove ... but,
let me make it clearer. *There are far more damn idiots in the arts,
music, philosophy, etc. *These are NOT exact sciences; much is left open
to "interpretation." *It is only logical that a phd in such fields would
not be such a task as would exist in the exact sciences; *However, this
is off balanced by the lower IQs which these individuals pursuing these
fields tend to display ... so, simply put, it takes the dummies longer!
* ROFLOL

Regards,
JS

Is there a 'possibility' that an IQ Test is good at
measuring those Brain Functions and Abilities
that make a good Engineers and does not do
as good a job measuring what it takes to be a
good artist or musician . . .- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sounds plausible. Having said that, there are plenty of studues that
have provided good statistical correlation between musical skill and
high levels of math and science comprehension and ability. Does this
mean that the two skillsets are intercheangeable? Almost certainly
not - but it suggests that the brain recognizes the similarities and
overlaps.

Alberts Einstein and Schweitzer were both fine musicians. Schweitzer
was a genius on the organ.

Bruce Jensen