Idiots-R-Us : Equal Protection 'Under' The Law -and- The Equalityof All Human {Civil} Rights
On Oct 5, 6:42*pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote:
On 10/5/2010 6:54 PM, RHF wrote:
On Oct 5, 11:24 am, Chïna Blüe Öyster Cult
wrote:
In article ,
*Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
On 10/3/2010 7:27 PM, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:
"CC",
All nice and good but Ignores the Fact
that it all Negates "Freedom of Religion".
* .
Once Again Let Me Repeat Myself :
Put a "Freedom of Religion" 'Clause' In Any
"Gay Marriage" Law and I Am For It [A-OK]
-however- Leave It Out and Force Churches to
Perform "Gay Marriage" and I Am Against It [.]
It's against the law for government to tell a church what to do.
I say the 1866 equal protection law applies, as well as the 14th amendment.
Amendment IX
- - The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not
be
- - construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
- One of the enumerated rights is the right
- to equal protection of the law.
=WRT= Equal Protection 'Under' The Law
-and- The Equality of All Human {Civil} Rights
[nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.]
NO one can marry direct DNA relations(Family) and NO body can marry
anyone but the opposite sex.....
Gays would have no physical reason to *NOT* marry family since they
can't produce retarded/weak DNA offspring. So when you allow the gays to
marry the Heterosexuals will then be able to complain that their civil
rights are being violated by stopping them from marrying their brother
or sister or son or daughter. Then using equal protection under the law
you would be forced to allow heterosexual family members like brother,
sister or father, daughter marriages also.
And that is one reason that Marriage is NOT what is needed for gays. You
have a death certificate for a reason and you don't use a death
certificate for someones birth, they are for different purposes, as
should Marriage NOT be used for both Heterosexual and Homosexual unions.
They are two very different applications of law and to use the same
document and rules and regulations will be a disservice to one or the
other and at some point would lead to violating the "equal protection
under the law" part of the constitution.
Do you always make it up as you go along?
|