View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old October 15th 10, 05:19 PM posted to rec.scuba,rec.radio.shortwave,alt.fan.harry-potter,rec.food.cooking,alt.2eggs.sausage.beans.tomatoes.2toast.largetea.cheerslove
Dillon Pyron Dillon Pyron is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 1
Default why we need more stronger gun control

[Default] Thus spake den :

On Oct 10, 4:45*pm, Mack A. Damia wrote:
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:38:02 -0500, Andy wrote:
Gun control just means hitting what you aim at!


I agree!

A Phoenix police officer told a store owner that he should shoot to
kill rather than wounding the trash that kept trying to kill him, and
robbing his store. That is defense of your private property.


I have not been trained to shoot to kill. That can be construed as
voluntary mansllaughter. I shoot to stop. If it kills, so be it. As
long as it stops the attack.

Shooting to wound could be interpretted as saying that there might
have been that there was a less than lethal means of stopping the
attack. Which could be constrsued as assault & battery with a deadly
weapon.


The twisted thinking of the Australian OP comes from living in a
country defending itself with knives. Notice that he does not mention
the horrific picture of the person with the cut throat.Thank GOD he
won't be voting for the "Disarm USA" people.


"I'll let my nanny state take care of me. Boo hoo hoo."

And you know the "To protect and serve" you see on most police cars in
the US. That has been consitently ruled to be a slogan and not an
obligation. Courts view police as crime solvers, not preventer,
except in very extraordiinary circumstances.



--

- dillon I am not invalid

Toby (Tri-Umph That's the Sweet Truth)
March 1998 - June 2010
What a dog. What a dog!