On Oct 18, 6:09 pm, RHF wrote:
JS,
There should be NO Jury .
There should be NO Trial .
There should be NO Charge .
There should be NO Crime .
IT WAS SELF-DEFENSE [.]

We need an Initiative in the State of California
"The Individual's Right to Self-Defense of Self,
Family and
Home"http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/how-to-qualify-an-ini...

* Criminal comes in your Home : It's Self-Defense
and No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.

* Criminal threatens Your-Self : It's Self-Defense and
No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.

* Criminal threatens Your-Family : It's Self-Defense
and No Criminal Charges can be brought by the DA.

+ Plus NO Civil Actions Either by the Criminal, Their
Family; Their Agents and/or 'others'.

CRIMINAL = Someone Committing a Criminal Act on
Your Person {Self}; Your Family/Love-One/Neighbor;
Home/Neighborhood; Business/Property.

Note - Self-Defense Is NOT A Crime as Defined-by-Law.

DA = Any and all Attorneys representing City/County/State.

-example-
Someone 'Smokes' in your House and You Shoot Them :
It's Self-Defense Against Poisonous Second-Hand Smoke.

yes it is that simple 'self-defense' is 'self-defense'
and 'self-defense' is a basic "human-right" ~ RHF

Roy,

Aside from the fact that you're nuts....

If such a law existed (minus the lunacy about shooting someone who smokes in
your house.. that would never in a million years fly..), it would be too
easy to abuse it, ie if you wanted to kill someone and get away with it, all
you would have to do is make sure they were in your house under any pretense
and blow them away.