On Nov 1, 10:21*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
Before this thread gets out of line again let me make clear a couple
of points that some have got hold of which has led them astray.
First it is well known that Gauss was a part of the equations of
maxwell with his contribution on magnetics
I focussed on Gauss's contribution via statics using the boundary
rules. It can be seen that applying a time varying current to a
gaussian field is exactly the same as Maxwells first equation! Yes you
have to convert from cgs units to show this but it clearly places
particles as the root of radiation.
The second point that some planted themselves on was that all
elements were resonant and therefore all should be fed. The real point
here is that all being resonant
showed the presence of equilibrium which is a must in all equations.
It also showed that with a minimum of two elements all radiation is
accounted for where-as with the yagi which is not in equilibrium has
losses because the last element added fails to recover remaining
available radiation. This is not about getting a better antenna than a
yagi since the latter utelizes available radiation with less waste
than others. The patent is really about obtaining knowledge that fits
the bill of Maxwell's first equation and points to the static particle
accelerated
into a charge by a time varying current. It also brings into question
that put forward by the London brothers regarding cooper pairs as well
as the relationship of a proton. It also makes clear that the double
slot experiment
is correct in stating that particles and waves have similar
properties but makes very clear that the subject at hand
is very much a particle. Thus the bottom line is that Gauss provided
direction with respect to the static aproach AS WELL as the more well
known magnetic connection. It is also important to state again the
importance of maintaining equilibrium when persuing the laws of
Maxwell. I would also like to add my assertion
of just two vectors as the sole constituents of the standard model
that Einstein earlier suspected.
At the same time Maxwells law has not been fully satisfied as it has
not removed the intrinsic resistance of the radiators because of the
presence of skin effect and thus the magnetic field which has no
contribution to the accountability of all forces. However it is
important to note
that in superconductors removal of the magnetic field
achieves the desired action as would a Meander style radiator where in
the absence of skin depth the current
would rise to the surface thus eliminating resistance losses incurred
by the radiator, which now can add to the desired maximum radiation
efficiency by tackling the
radiation resistance, that is the only resistance left.
Thanks for your time
Regards
Art.