On Nov 3, 12:51*am, Bill wrote:
On Nov 1, 10:21*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
Before this thread gets out of line again

All threads which begin with a post of yours "gets out of line".

Maybe. But I proffer it to point out that Maxwells equation for
radiation is nothing but a formula if one concentrates on the electro
magnetics approach. It is the electro static approach of Gauss of
adding a time varying field to a Gaussian field to obtain maxwells
first equation, where the equation is given informative meaning and
direction which has deluded all for the past century. With respect to
the pursuit of equilibrium for all equations the idea that all
elements within a Gaussian boundary should be fed because they are all
resonant is a fallacy, as is having more than two elements. Newtons
laws demand only two opposing vectors to oppose the vectors of
gravity and spin which are the pillars of the "standard model" which
with respect to radiation show them selves as the direct variant
current vector and that of spin. I make a point of that because it
points the way for maximum efficiency by removal of resistance created
by skin depth restrictions to current flow to member surface. All the
above can be ascribed
to taking the statics approach in the exact formulation of Maxwell
equations, instead of the route taken by Maxwell by his addition such
that all units of his equation canceled out as required for
equilibrium. So yes, there will always be bickering when change is
suggested but the usual case is that a presented theory is technically
challenged by one peers rather than by taunts and jeers.
Regards
Art..... KB9MZ