View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Old November 10th 10, 07:07 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.news-media,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.liberalism
[email protected] arthrnyork@webtv.net is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,095
Default The "Gridlock" Bogeyman

On Nov 9, 8:13*pm, "Sid9" wrote:
"?baMa? Tse Dung" wrote in ... Whenever the party that controls the White House does not also control
Capitol Hill, political pundits worry that there will be "gridlock" in
Washington, so that the government cannot solve the nation's problems.


Almost never is that fear based on what actually happens when there is
divided government, compared to what happens when one party has a
monopoly of both legislative and executive branches.


The last time the federal government had a budget surplus, instead of
its usual deficits, there was divided government. That was when the
Republicans controlled the House of Representatives, where all
spending bills originate, and Bill Clinton was in the White House. The
media called it "the Clinton surplus."


.
.
Do you call it the St Reagan deficit?
Do you call it the HW Bush deficit?
Do you call it the bush,jr financial disaster, debt, deficit and unfunded
unfinished wars?

Hypocrite!


It is St.Ronald . He favored baloon economy where any bankster got
away with just about anything. From M.Milken to B.Madoff. As simple
as that- why is everyone and his uncle blaming the new rookie in the
White House is beyond my comprehension .