View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 15th 10, 06:04 PM posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
o pere o o pere o is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2010
Posts: 2
Default Regarding Rp of an LC

On 11/15/2010 03:49 PM, amdx wrote:
On the webpage http://www.crystal-radio.eu/engev.htm the author diagrams a
crystal radio with Rp as the losses in L1 and C1. Then he goes further and
loads L1C1 with an antenna, this reduces Q by 1/2.
He then adds we can calculate the value of Rp as follows: Rp=2.pi.f.L.Q (Q
Unloaded).
My question; Why does he do all further calculations with Rp rather than
1/2Rp, since the Q of L1C1 is
reduced to 1/2 by the antenna loading.
MikeK


From what I read, I guess:

1. He works out the optimum match between antenna and LC tank.
2. She investigates the optimum match between LC tank and load
completely unrelated to 1.

OTOH, I would be glad to find a reference on how to accurately derive
the proposed equivalent circuit of the diode detector at low signal levels.

Pere