On Dec 8, 8:18*pm, wrote:
On Dec 8, 4:21*pm, Sean Con wrote:



Art, can you please contact me to my email address directly, because i
feel people dont like us discussing something.

Actually, quite the opposite. I think he's a hoot, and look
forward to his posts. It's better than the comedy channel.
Feel free to carry on.

Sean, the poster is qualified to speak into a microphone as he has a
ham licence. However he freely admits to not graduating from high
school, so please judge his comments on his background. He is not the
only one in this group that has ham licence and feels qualified
in physics to a University level.
Anybody can post an opinion on this newsgroup
even tho the title has a suggestion of some antenna expertise. On the
other side oif the coin there are a few qualified and degreed with
respect to antennas but refuse to get involved
verbally with spammers on the side lines. We had a guy with a
doctorate from MIT who came aboard to explain Gauss contribution with
respect to amalgamating static with dynamic which you noted equaled
Maxwell's equation for radiation, but he left after they trashed his
mathematical input. Most still think that Gaussian input to Maxwells
laws only with respect to magnetics and nothing else despite being
shown the mathematics of the addition of a time variant to a Gaussian
boundary. Only a few understand the importance of equilibrium no less
or what it means, even tho it has been explained to them more than
once.
Everybody is mentioned in the archives with copies of their past
postings. You should get the message after viewing some of those, most
of which is just spam with zero content.
Stand fast
Art