On Dec 8, 9:47*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Dec 8, 8:18*pm, wrote:

On Dec 8, 4:21*pm, Sean Con wrote:

Art, can you please contact me to my email address directly, because i
feel people dont like us discussing something.

Actually, quite the opposite. I think he's a hoot, and look
forward to his posts. It's better than the comedy channel.
Feel free to carry on.

Sean, the poster is qualified to speak into a microphone as he has a
ham licence. However he freely admits to not graduating from high
school, so please judge his comments on his background. He is not the
only one in *this group that has ham licence and feels qualified
in physics to a University level.

I'm sure it must chap your ass to no end, that someone
who was expelled from high school knows more about
antennas than you do.
But this type of retort is about all you can expect from
an individual who's qualifications and training in antenna
theory or even physics in general are no greater than mine.

For one thing, they don't teach antenna theory in high school.
So it's obvious that anyone that does know any amount of
antenna theory did not learn it in high school, unless they
learned it on their own. I was building antennas when I was in
Junior High. So I was already learning antenna theory before
I even got to High School. How about you?

You do not know physics on a university level, so I fail to
see how your complaint carries any weight at all.
But the real irony is that you whine about my education,
but yet you can't even spell license. :/
It would be pathetic if it were not so damn hilarious.

I talk about real antennas. Not conjured mumbo jumbo
pseudo science theories.
You are the only person I know that tries to explain
the operation of a device that doesn't even exist.
And yes, I find it hilarious. Deal with it.