On Dec 8, 11:07*pm, wrote:
On Dec 8, 10:36*pm, Art Unwin wrote:



Well you do admit to no high school graduation
and appear to be proud of it *so it is a bit silly for you to throw
stones being such an easy target.

Being as I was expelled, I really didn't have much say so
in the matter. *Easy target? Don't make me laugh..
How many people do you see claiming what I write
is mumbo jumbo pseudo science horse caca?

How many for you?

I rest my case.. *:/

Now if you were willing to learn and
debate we all could judge what you have to offer.

More than once I've shot down a few of your silly
theories with a single shot. I didn't even have to reload.
Of course, you either fail to comprehend, or you totally
ignore. I consider that a personal problem which is
out of my control. You can lead a jackass to water,
but damned if you can make one drink it..

I do agree that you
had a lot of experience with different antennas during your CB
days.

My CB days? *Art, you are a braying jackass.
I built my first 40 meter transmitter from junk parts when
I was in the 8th grade. I was a SWL well before then.

But even I were into CB's, what difference would that make?
Absolutely none. Radios operated on 27 mhz seem
to follow all the same rules as ones operated on 28 mhz
last time I looked.

Are you claiming special properties for CB radios?

Your interpretation of your experiments
however may vary from others.

What experiments would those be?
I've done hundreds of them..

I f you do have some knoweledge that is
pertinent to my comments or overthrow them your standing within the
group may well rise but you appear to have nothing to share other than
spam.

My first post in this thread detailed a simple way
for you to prove or disprove all of your pseudo science
theories. It was so simple, even a caveman could do it.
But not that crap for brains Art Unwin... Noooooooooo!
He's still lost in the fog, clutching at straws, and
barking at the levitating neutrinos.

And trying to figure out how to spell knowledge. *:/

So what is the reason you inserted yourself into this thread? What is
it that you wanted to offer to this thread? Do you have a problem with
the levitation of neutrinos that you just can't let go?Just pull out a
point stated in this thread and supply a reasoned technical approach
as to why it couldn't possibly be so. Perhaps you can start with the
Gaussian contribution with respect to particles instead of waves which
got you started way back when.
Your choice and chance to share your technical expertise with respect
to radiation and where you have a quarrel with what I present or
propose. So Sean as you can see there is considerable opposition to
talk in technical terms about radiation where SWR discussions
is considered to be the cusp of ham radio.