On 12/8/2010 11:38 PM, Art Unwin wrote:
On Dec 8, 11:07 pm, wrote:
snip
My first post in this thread detailed a simple way
for you to prove or disprove all of your pseudo science
theories. It was so simple, even a caveman could do it.
But not that crap for brains Art Unwin... Noooooooooo!
He's still lost in the fog, clutching at straws, and
barking at the levitating neutrinos.

And trying to figure out how to spell knowledge. :/

So what is the reason you inserted yourself into this thread? What is
it that you wanted to offer to this thread? Do you have a problem with
the levitation of neutrinos that you just can't let go?Just pull out a
point stated in this thread and supply a reasoned technical approach
as to why it couldn't possibly be so. Perhaps you can start with the
Gaussian contribution with respect to particles instead of waves which
got you started way back when.
Your choice and chance to share your technical expertise with respect
to radiation and where you have a quarrel with what I present or
propose. So Sean as you can see there is considerable opposition to
talk in technical terms about radiation where SWR discussions
is considered to be the cusp of ham radio.

One of the things that highlights your intellect is how you never deal
with the responses from the people, all you do is change the subject.

tom
K0TAR