On Dec 11, 10:14*am, joe wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Dec 10, 8:37 am, joe wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
I am sure you also know that only
units used by Mawell represent the path
to maximum efficiency in radiation as well as
the ratio of capacitance to inductance must be
unity.
Art KB9MZ....xg

Art, You have just mentioned a constraint on antennas that I was not
aware of. *Specifically "the ratio of capacitance to inductance must be
unity".

This is new to me. Please tell me how I go about making capacitance and
inductance equal so their ratio can be unity. How do you get the Farads
and Henries to cancel out, leaving a dimensionless number.

Can you give me some real world examples?

joe

I will be happy to do so
Root L/C = 1

This means that L/C both of which are loss contributors are removed
from any formulae
Art

Art,
That does not address the question at all.

How do the Henries in L and the Farads in C cancel to give a dimensionless
number?

A real world example would have numbers and a description the one could
duplicate to better understand what you are syaing.

joe

Think about it Joe
If you had an equation for efficiency it would be dimensionless.
Typically you would have a portion in that equation that depicts
perfection
and also a portion depicting deviation from perfection.So the second
portion points to what creates losses and the first part points to
perfection. Now look at root L/C which points to the constitution of
that which creates losses.
Now ideally we would like this portion to be 1
which states zero losses, an ideal situation.
Thus we can say the losses involved equals
root L/C which must equal "1" Logic therefore tells you that both L
and C are loss leaders whether they be lumped or distributed and
therefore not part of the vectors that create
acceleration of charge. Remember for legitimacy all formulae must
equal zero for equilibrium and therefore resolves into zero units. Now
if you are unaware where root L/C
appears in the study of radiation this is a good time to hit the books
to fill that gap.
Best regards
Art Unwin KB9MZ xg

What has been proved so far with this theory?
Particles and not waves
Magnetic fiels removal removes skin depth
Reprosity
The importance of diamagnetics
Vectors of currents, time varying and displacement are the equal and
opposite of
gravity and rotation
L and C are loss leaders
Particles/ free electrons, are not the constituent
of the radiating element.
The Standard Forces are resolved by just the two vectors only created
by the Big Bang or the
fracture of the original boundary depicted by Newtons law.
And it goes on but hams deny change.