On Dec 11, 7:20*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Dec 10, 2:40*pm, K1TTT wrote:



On Dec 10, 4:12*pm, Art Unwin wrote:

On Dec 10, 8:37*am, joe wrote:

Art Unwin wrote:
*I am sure you also know that only
units used by Mawell represent the path
to maximum efficiency in radiation as well as
the ratio of capacitance to inductance must be
*unity.
Art KB9MZ....xg

Art, You have just mentioned a constraint on antennas that I was not aware
of. *Specifically "the ratio of capacitance to inductance must be unity".

This is new to me. Please tell me how I go about making capacitance and
inductance equal so their ratio can be unity. How do you get the Farads and
Henries to cancel out, leaving a dimensionless number.

Can you give me some real world examples?

joe

I will be happy to do so
Root L/C = 1

This means that L/C both of which are loss contributors are removed
from any formulae
Art

neither L nor C contributes any loss in any kind of circuit analysis i
have ever seen.... its always the R that converts the electrical
energy to heat to remove it from doing something useful besides
heating the room.

Silly
Impedance consists of resistance Ra and reactance *jxx. You can remove
resistance Ra from an element while the reactance constituent can
still remain.
*Thus the impedance remains real.
Don't give up your job just yet!

lets see, you remove the resistance which is the 'real' part of the
impedance, which gives you the imaginary reactance part as noted by
the 'j' above, and you think its real... probably just as real as your
pancake antenna in its faraday cage. you never have explained how my
ferromagnetic antenna works without your magical diamagnetic
levitating neutrinos.