Thread: Sidebands
View Single Post
  #101   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 11, 04:20 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
[email protected] jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default Sidebands

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Jan 2, 5:48 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

Seperate "electric field", "magnetic field", gravity field" are for kids.


of course, that is why you haven't learned enough to understand them

that way yet, you are below kids in understanding fields.

The only trouble for kids to remembe are the "hand rules".
Kids do not try to understand. They must remember.
Good memeory is most important in schools.


The "hand rules" were invented to be a memory aid, and that is all they
are, a memory aid.

Charged body at rest produces the electric field but a moving body do not

produce the electric field but magnetic.
Do you understand it?


do you understand that the electric field from a charged body at rest

does not propagate, it is static everywhere so there are no waves.

But in antennas charge appears and disappears. Electric waves must appear.
Some Authors call them electrostatic waves.


Complete nonsense.

but what about if the body is at rest in one inertial frame and you

are moving past it in another one, do you see a magnetic field or
not?

No. No magnetic charge and no magnetic field.


Wiki wrote: "They initially interpreted these redshifts and blue shifts
as
due solely to the Doppler effect, but later Hubble discovered a rough

correlation between the increasing redshifts and the increasing distance
of
galaxies. Theorists almost immediately realized that these observations
could be explained by a different mechanism for producing redshifts.
Hubble's law of the correlation between redshifts and distances is
required
by models of cosmology derived from general relativity that have a metric
expansion of space.[16] As a result, photons propagating through the
expanding space are stretched, creating the cosmological redshift."

Photons are stretched with the distance.
Damped waves are like photons.

S*


now that is a good laugh... stretching photons would be quite a trick

since they don't exist in Maxwell's equations. damped waves may be
made of many photons, but they are not 'like' photons... they are just
another set of em waves propagating along just like any other.

With the decreased amplitudes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ondes_amorties.jpg
S*


Reposting the same **** in French does not make it applicable to EM radiation.

You are a babbling idiot.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.