View Single Post
  #99   Report Post  
Old January 5th 11, 03:24 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.religion.christian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.liberalism
D Peter Maus[_2_] D Peter Maus[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2010
Posts: 48
Default The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint

On 1/4/11 20:42 , wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:33:07 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

Read it. Read the Federalist Papers, while you're at it.

THe constittution is a rule of law.



The Constitution is a rule of law. That law limits the power of
Government, and specifically guarantees the rights of the people.


The constitution is the framework of our republic, predicated on a set
of philosophical foundations, and establishes a consistent rule of
law.

The interpretation of it related
to enacted or codified law has allowed those "right" to be terminated,
modified, or regulated.


Interpretation allows its intent to be ignored.


The belief of an interpretation like that is to deny the foundation of
the constitution and 300 Yrs of established law.



Interpretation presupposes that an intent other than the text of the
document is required.

By definition, an interpretation is an inaccurate understanding, and
allows the intent of the text to be ignored.




Submission to tyranny as inevitable is as much a crime as the
tyranny, itself.

The federalist papers are not law--they carry NO legal weight


The Supremes disagree.


There is no USSC decision that any federalist paper provides legal
foundation to.


They were cited in the recent 2nd Amendment decision.