View Single Post
  #119   Report Post  
Old January 5th 11, 09:44 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.religion.christian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.liberalism
D. Peter Maus[_2_] D. Peter Maus[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 665
Default The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint

On 1/5/11 14:27 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:47:20 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

On 1/5/11 12:20 ,
wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:49:50 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

On 1/4/2011 9:42 PM,
wrote:


Interpretation allows its intent to be ignored.

The belief of an interpretation like that is to deny the foundation of
the constitution and 300 Yrs of established law.

Judges interpreting laws and case law has been a new development of the
last 100 years.

Then you haven't read Marbury v Madison



One of the singular most insidious power grabs in the history of
the Union.


That's what Judge Roy Moore believes(d)

How'd that work out for him?

But once again, you're countering with a rebuttal based on dislike of
the ruling---


Nothing different than anything you're doing. Interesting that
you don't like it.