Thread: Look who wants to quintuple funding for government media
View Single Post
  #124   Report Post  
Old January 5th 11, 09:50 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.religion.christian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.liberalism
D. Peter Maus[_2_] D. Peter Maus[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 665
Default The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint
On 1/5/11 14:28 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:39:27 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

On 1/5/11 12:18 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:46:31 -0600, D Peter
wrote:

On 1/5/11 09:11 , wrote:

What you're really describing---is a tendency to assign falsity to
anything you don't agree with---.


As are you. What's your point.

I'm not the one claiming any interpretaton of law other than what you
agree with is correct

You are.

I'm not the one claiming any interpretation of law other than
what you agree with is incorrect.


You just claimed that from the late 18th century/early 19th---that
rulings related to judicial review were malappropriate.


And you're not addressing what's being said to you.

THIS is the exchange currently on the table:


I'm not the one claiming any interpretaton of law other than what you
agree with is correct

You are.

I'm not the one claiming any interpretation of law other than
what you agree with is incorrect.


You dismiss my points on technique. The very technique you,
yourself employ.

So, it's only wrong when you're not doing it.




LOL!





Reply With QuoteReply With Quote