View Single Post
  #135   Report Post  
Old January 6th 11, 05:42 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.religion.christian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.liberalism
D. Peter Maus[_2_] D. Peter Maus[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 665
Default The Constitution is a building code, not a blueprint

On 1/5/11 23:30 , wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:50:55 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

I'm not the one claiming any interpretation of law other than
what you agree with is incorrect.



You dismiss my points on technique.


I'm repeating what you claim----that decisions that you disagree with
are labeled "unconstitutional" and a "power grab"



And when they are, I'm right to do so.


You don't get to dismiss my points based solely on the fact that
I disagree with said decisions.

That's also quite telling.

The truth is, that you've yet to make a point based in anything
other than your disagreement with my points. Your claim that you have
support of law is, in fact, the point dissent. You've offered nothing
more than that you agree with your position.