On 2/28/2011 7:24 PM, Richard Clark wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:36:27 -0600, John -
wrote:

I didn't mean Wimpie was right about his technical response. I meant he
was right about a part of his message which you cut:

I selectively quote to make the response specific to the point being
responded to (like I am right now). It saves room, is not ambiguous,
and serves the technical community by confining discussion to
technical matters.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Then I'll just have to put the "point" back in

Quote Wim
I agree with you that several statements on Norbert's site will not
hold when scientifically reviewed. However I think the way you
respond will likely not result in better statements.

As the name of the newsgroup indicates; this is a radio amateur group
and Norbert site starts with "Dutch amateur radio station". This may
require another approach then you should use in a professional
environment. If you prefer that, Edaboard.com (just an example) is a
more suitable place.
/Quote