View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old March 6th 11, 08:55 AM posted to ba.broadcast,rec.radio.shortwave,alt.radio.digital
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default IBOC : A Natural Evolution Requires Time and HD-Radio's Time Has NotYet Come . . .

On Mar 4, 7:58*pm, SMS wrote:
On 3/4/2011 7:20 PM, RHF wrote:

Your Many Multiple {Spamming} Screen IDs
All End-Up ~translating~to~ LAMFAO !


clearly time-and-time again
demonstrating you are a 'fao' ~ RHF


It's a natural reaction. He's bitter and disappointed about the success
digital radio has had in the marketplace. When Mexico adopted HD Radio
last week he must have been in tears.

I've seen a lot on Usenet over the years, and he and several of the
anti-digital-radio shills are right up there with the best of the best
in terms of trolls.

But there actually is something to the article in The Register. If
Europe wants to get serious about digital radio they need to adopt the
system used in the U.S. which has gained acceptance by broadcasters,
receiver manufacturers, automakers, and consumers. FM analog radio is
one of the few technologies that's relatively the same throughout the
world (the differences are small enough that receiver makers don't need
completely different receivers for each market). It would be nice if FM
digital followed the same path, and since HD is the furtherst ahead it
makes sense for the rest of the world to use the HD system.


SMS,

It's the Domino Theory All Over and Over Again
First the USA [FCC] Adopts IBOC HD-Radio...
and then country after Country after COUNTRY
Adopts HD-Radio . . .
-truly-it's-a-nightmare-for the-hd-radio--haters-

Not Truly A HD-Radio Hater . . .
-or- A HD-Radio Lover . . .

but,, But... BUT ! ! ! Knowing . . .

That Generation Changes Take A Generation
Give IBOC & HD-Radio One Generation . . .

time will tell . . . ~ RHF