View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old March 16th 11, 07:37 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
[email protected] arthrnyork@webtv.net is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,095
Default Worse Than Chernobyl

On Mar 15, 2:42*pm, dave wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/15/wo....html?ref=asia

"A 1997 study by the Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island
described a worst-case disaster from uncovered spent fuel in a reactor
cooling pool. It estimated 100 quick deaths would occur within a range
of 500 miles and 138,000 eventual deaths.

The study also found that land over 2,170 miles would be contaminated
and damages would hit $546 billion.

That section of the Brookhaven study focused on boiling water reactors —
the kind at the heart of the Japanese crisis. "


The only safe N. reactor is the one on the pages of a Physics book .
BNL itself claims to be "supersafe" . BTW, in is near the same
location were Tesla had one of his science projects (Wardenclyffe
Tower) .