On Mar 17, 6:43*pm, RHF wrote:
On Mar 17, 5:31*pm, Bob Dobbs wrote:

RHF wrote:
Getting From Here To There Requires Clean Coal !

Getting to any logical point in your comments,
however impossible it may turn out to be,
would require a solution to your oxymoronic reference
to "Clean Coal"
--

http://bit.ly/g2PCII

"Clean Coal" is only an 'Oxy+Moron'
*IF* You Are The Latter Using The Former ;;-}}
-wrt- 'Oxy+Moron'

"Clean Coal" is a Relative Term that is a Work
in Progress {Evolving} :
Very Much Cleaner Burning Than 100 Years Ago
Much Cleaner Burning Than 50 Years Ago
More Cleaner Burning Than 25 Years Ago
Coal Coal Technologies Improve Each Year and
Cleaner Coal Burning Is Doable Today with
Refitted 'Improved' Coal Burning Power Planets
and New/Newer Coal Burning Power Planets

What Would You Rather Have A One Foot Cube
{Block} of Nuclear Waste Encased in Glass in
Your Front Room -or- *A One Foot Cube {Block}
of Clean Coal Waste Encased in Glass ? ? ?
*.
Your Choice : The Real Bad Nasty Nuke "Stuff"
-or- The Relatively Not As Bad Clean Coal "Stuff"http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/4d72ef494dec66f9
*.
Your Choice : The Real Bad Nasty Nuke "Stuff"
-or- The Relatively Not As Bad Clean Coal "Stuff"http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/94e203726a5bb2cb
*.
Your Choice : The Real Bad Nasty Nuke "Stuff"
-or- The Relatively Not As Bad Hydro & Clean Coal "Stuff"http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/c19af421816bd3bb
*.
*.

It still produces excess tons of CO2.