On Mar 24, 12:03*pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote:
On 3/24/2011 2:48 PM, bpnjensen wrote:





On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote:
On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

Which is why some people create no wealth.....

Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from
money---they contribute nothing to society

Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that
are considered wealth, is creating wealth. *The person organizing the
production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. *Without
them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive
people to create wealth, no wealth would be created.

Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of
wealth due to a lack of ability.

Who created the Microsoft Wealth? *Without Bill Gates, who would have
created personal computing that would become a world wide success.

He did not create it so much as concentrate it. *Now, he's beginning
to spread it around again...but still, not creating it.

What does your Operating system say?

That's who created it.

Others were created but they are not creating as much wealth.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Again, concentrating wealth. It has nothing to do with who made the
operating system, but whether or not the wealth he gained was NOT at
the expense of anyone else. The only way the human race gains wealth
is to mine it or harvest it from the earth - and even then, the earth
loses something. The resource is finite, and only its redistribution
decides who gets rich and who stays poor. You're just kididing
yourself otherwise. You cannot get something from nothing.