On 3/27/2011 1:14 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:
On Mar 25, 12:17 am, wrote:
On Mar 24, 4:20 pm, RHF wrote:



On Mar 24, 11:44 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-

wrote:
On 3/24/2011 2:24 PM, wrote:

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:10 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
wrote:

Which is why some people create no wealth.....

Which is why, when the wealth class creates nothing but money from
money---they contribute nothing to society

Creating Corporations that allow useless people to produce things that
are considered wealth, is creating wealth. The person organizing the
production from nothing shares in the creation of that wealth. Without
them creating and organizing a place for the otherwise unproductive
people to create wealth, no wealth would be created.

Where as the people on their own could NOT have produced anything of
wealth due to a lack of ability.

- Who created the Microsoft Wealth?
- Without Bill Gates, who would have
- created personal computing that would
- become a world wide success.

D'Oh ! Those Two Guy from Apple : Sure did
very well without BG@MS - imho ~ RHF
.
-a-minor-historical-point-
It was the IBM PC and IBM Corp that was the
the 'creative force' that caused BG@MS and
MS Corp to become what it was in the 1990s.
.
.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

IBM was the main driving force of 'mini-computers' in the early 80's .
HRM BG is one lucky SOB. And the rest is history . . .

actually it was commodore, atari and apple. ibm was a late comer into
the mini-computer race.


Sinclare was a tiny little computer that was affordable and you saved
programs onto a casset tape. I had one, it was among the first
affordable computers.