On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 18:51:06 -0500, John - KD5YI
wrote:

Your posts are occasionally informative, but usually not, as
demonstrated here. You have not offered anything of technical substance
in so many of your posts. It is obvious that you are knowledgeable in
the subject, but you seem to have a problem communicating that
knowledge. We could all benefit from your knowledge, but please do so
with direct technical information rather than the example above.

Hi John,

Technical chaff is rarely useful information. I am pretty sure that
was the point (but it is a rather Baroque discussion) Richard was
trying to illustrate.

Simple observation will reveal how this thread has become about trying
to get the camel through the eye of the needle: Richard's link points
to data that reveals differences displayable (and arguably
measureable) only out to 10% - that is pretty meager steam for heated
rhetoric in this engine of discussion (it has been far more about
purple prose than substance before I dipped my oar here).

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC