View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
Old April 13th 11, 02:31 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
dave dave is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default (OT) : As long as it's just the North Pacific I guess...hey waita minute!

On 04/12/2011 09:48 PM, bpnjensen wrote:


The problem Dave relates, that of further meltdown and steam
explosion, is demonstrably more immediate and dangerous locally.
Earthwide, however, not a big deal, for the same reason - dilution.
If it goes on for a LONG time, like years, I suppose it could have
effects on populations of nearby Pacific Islands, assuming favorable
wind patterns...but I'd have to see some better analysis to be
convinced.

That, from a die-hard environmentalist.

Bruce Jensen


You can't dilute radioactive particles and make them less mutagenic; you
are just dispersing them more.

When the secondary containment of F.D. reactor 3 exploded three days
into the incident its spent fuel (waste) pond was pulverized and the
contents were scattered for many kilometers around the plant. At that
point the incident was in Chernobyl category 7 territory, but the
authorities were afraid to panic rescue workers away from the region.