Cleaning out QEX magazines
On 4/14/2011 5:18 PM, Scott wrote:
On 4-14-2011 12:51, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
I would respectfully suggest that you are missing the big picture. It's
not just the magazine(s).
Like them or not, the ARRL is the ONLY organization that supports ham
radio on a national level, going to bat for us before Congress and the
FCC.
73,
Joe
Yes, I understand that very well. However, they should have more money
to spend to fight for ham radio if they would let me substitute the 6
issues per year of QEX versus the 12 issues of QST.
N0EDV
On 4/14/2011 9:47 PM, tom wrote:
I'm basing this opinion on the ARRL budgets that were published in QST
about 20 years ago. They currently (still) claim they are there for
mainly 2 things, protecting our rights and privileges as operators and
adding new operators through education and other methods. Unless they
have gotten rid of all the bits they used to have that they didn't need,
they are still spending between 2 and 5% of the money they collect on
what's supposed to be the main goal.
Where does all the rest go? Read the budgets if they still make them
available.
Charlatans then, are they now? I don't know. And don't care. They lost me.
tom
K0TAR
tom, just my personal opinion, but too bad you left the ARRL and too bad
you don't care.
I don't know about your "2 to 5%" figure, but even if it is true, it's
exactly 2 to 5% more than any other organization is spending to go to
bat for ham radio...and IMHO, we NEED (and should support) a national
organization.
73,
Joe
|