Constitution is vague and subject to contemporary interpretation
hal lillywhite wrote:
On Apr 25, 10:33 pm, Bill Shatzer wrote:
hal lillywhite wrote:
It's the bug which is the search or seizure.
Still, it's searches and seizures which the constitution addresses.
Agreed and it is rather clear when a cop is searching or seizing.
The infrared camera is not an entry at all - it is merely recording the
emissions coming from the dwelling in any case.
But clearly is seeking evidence if that is how they use it.
They're seeking evidence when they peer through a hole in the fence and
spot a marijuana grow in the back yard.
But there's rather more expectation of privacy inside a house than in
a yard.
And thus JUDGES have come up with the "reasonable expectation of
privacy" criterion - a standard which does not appear in the 4th
amendment nor in the 1791 English common law.
peace and justice,
|