Reply at the very bottom

"Ron" wrote in message
...
On May 1, 7:29 pm, John Smith wrote:
http://incontextreport.com/2011/04/2...ficate-was-cre...

This should cut though some of the obfuscation cr*p that some are
attempting to "disinform" with ...

Regards,
JS
..
..
Why in the name of sanity would you place trust in the "analysis" of
the Obama BC when the author repeatedly says "I don't know"? From
your cite we read:

1. All the letters in that portion are vectorized graphics except for
the R which looks pixelated. I don’t know why.

2. Secondly, there is a white faded ghost around all the text and
black lines of this document, again I don’t know why.

3. All the letters in that portion are vectorized graphics except for
the R which looks pixelated. I don’t know why.

4. Secondly, there is a white faded ghost around all the text and
black lines of this document, again I don’t know why.

5. It reveals a layer of white ghosting beneath it. I do not
understand this or know the purpose of it.

But....on the other hand, so many of your previous posts make
reference to Jones' PrisonPlanet and InfoWars. So in a left handed
way, you are consistent: You'll believe ANYTHING in print.

========== Reply below ==========

Don't forget this was also stated in the link:
"I am very confused by this but I can say with certainty that there are
major problems with this document. It’s almost as if someone from inside the
White House is trying to send a message to tell everyone that this is a
fake. Either that, or they are as stupid as they seem."

Rocky