View Single Post
  #57   Report Post  
Old May 4th 11, 12:11 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
dave dave is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2011
Posts: 3
Default Transmitter Output Impedance

On May 3, 2:01*pm, Wimpie wrote:
On 3 mayo, 02:09, Cecil Moore wrote:



On May 2, 5:23*pm, Wimpie wrote:


I am very sorry Cecil, but I still don't see the point where the
discussed method may go wrong.


Everyone seems to be charging ahead, willy-nilly, without seeing the
point which is that there are other effects present besides
reflections.


I think most of the discussion is ignoring lots of things... first of
all you must answer the question; Does it really matter? If it does,
then i will assume that you are a designer and know how to apply the
tube characteristics to come up with a design that matches your
selected tube to the expected load... but does that process really
ever describe the 'output impedance'?? Then you must also consider
the tuning parameters employed... sure, you can measure the output
impedance at a given operating point, but answer the question again;
Does it really matter? Or do you need to measure it over a wide range
of operating conditions? Every operator i have seen tune up one of my
amps has done it a little bit different... heck, i don't even do it
exactly the same twice in a row i bet. So when i am running an amp
into a switchable set of 7 different antenna combinations on a given
band, can tune from one end of the band to the other without touching
the settings, and can make an infinite number of small adjustments to
the drive, tune, and load settings, and on some bands can tweak a
tuner after the amp to 'make it happier', do I really care what the
'output impedance' really is? As long as the matching network
provides adequate adjustment so i can get out the desired power into
my various loads while keeping the tubes within their operating
limits, do i really care what the 'output impedance' really is at any
one set of conditions that i may never exactly duplicate again? I
think not. So this boils down to an academic discussion, and as in
many cases where no one has, or can, make an exact statement of the
problem the specific answer remains elusive. So consider this, until
you have a complete statement of the problem you will never be able to
derive a value that any two of you will agree on, let alone actually
try to set up a measurement of.