"Uno Hu" wrote in message
...


"Scout" wrote in message




"joeturn" wrote in message

..
.
On May 8, 4:24 am, "Scout"

wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message


.
..





On May 7, 11:14 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring
their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all
followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of
all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!

DUDE!

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ...
security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One -

Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html

Part Two -

Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html

Part Three -

Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_ha
lliburton...

Part Four -

Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe
the
detonaters were conected during that time!

Then clearly the building plans, contract documents, inspectors,
and so
on
would know ALL about them, right?

Lofferley did not know and he was involved.

Then it wasn't part of the design. QED.

If anything was put in anywhere for Bush..

It was during the period when cousin Marvin Bush was director of
security for the WTC - just months before its collapse.

Right, and as director he could naturally violate the terms of the
contractual security without anyone noticing, or even employees coming
forward later saying "Hey my boss ordered me to look the other way while all
these guys with pallets of explosives came into the building".

Sorry, but that's not going to hold water.