"joeturn" wrote in message
...
On May 9, 7:26 pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 8, 8:03 pm, Jim Kale wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/8/2011 9:34 AM, Jim Kale wrote:

...
You really are retarded if you think that **** holds any kind of
reality.
So uh, who's been charged for this "crime", you retard?
I mean if it's "proof", then why isn't anybody being charged, you
retard?

Really?

Yes, really!

Well, it is simple, prove what you say.

I am not obligated to prove a negative, you retard.

YOU have to prove what you say is correct, and then YOU still have
to
answer my questions, you retard.

Your "list" of "experts" are all known retards, like you.

ANSWER MY QUESTION, you retard!

You said YOU have proof, right?
Then WHY isn't anybody being arrested, charged, indicted,
incarcerated, etc., You stump stupid retard?

It was your Government that was guilty

Proof?

Didn't think you had any.



and they seem to have
diplomatic immunity from the Supreme Law of the Land.This is why noone
has been charged. They are in control of all three branches of
government the Excecutive,Legistlative and Judicial system. You can't
get a judge to try a case against their government,that would be
considered treason.Anything that gets excepted as a case gets
dismissed.Bush got his cousin to throw the case against him out.The
lady knew she was meant to be killed at the Pentagon and also knew no
plane hit the Pentagon. This is the smoking gun "the missile attack at
the Pentagon" and the shills are full force keeping that from the
public!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnzh-...layer_embedded

OMG, this is your proof?

Some asswipe that doesn't even understand that video is taken in a series of
FRAMES (ie individual pictures) and that the apparent motion is only a
result of looking at individual pictures in quick succession? That high
speed movement of an object will cause it to appear to leap from place to
place as you look at each individual picture in succession? That when you
slow a video WAY down, what you are doing is simply looking at one
individual picture for awhile and then switching to the next picture which
you look at for awhile and then you look at the next picture for awhile.
That what you see as slow motion in movies and so on is actually shoot at a
considerably higher number of frames per second and then played back at the
number rate making the motion appear slower.

With this as an example of your "proof" I'm not even going to waste my time
looking at the other link, or even bother looking at any of your claims of
'proof' because you don't even have enough intelligence to recognize the
flaws in the assertions made by these people you rely upon for your proof.

The only person who could possibly buy this sort of crap as 'proof' is
someone who is a ****ing stupid moron incapable of any sort of independent
evaluation of their own, but simply buy the claims of other ****ing stupid
morons as "proof".


http://letsrollforums.com/helicopter...licopter+pilot