On 5/9/2011 10:53 PM, joeturn wrote:
On May 10, 1:34 am, John wrote:
On 5/9/2011 10:29 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
I know for a fact an Ironworker wont cut a column on an angle rather
than straight through because of the time it would take.Who would want
to spend soo much time in all that heat and asbestos dust,when they
could cut the shortest and quicker path and move on to the next cut,a
junkyard man has better since that that!

Ever fall a tree with a chainsaw?

Same angled cut is used to control the direction of fall, else the
worker cutting a long beam is likely to be endangered having to scramble
out of its' way.

No, people cutting beams with a torch would be just as likely to make
angled cuts as demolition workers, and for the same reasons, to control
the direction of movement. With the demolition expert, he is attempting
to shift the building in a predetermined direction, in the case of the
torch/cutter, he is attempting a fall in a predetermined direction ...
neither adds nor subtracts from existing evidence and proof.

But, like I said, those are first responders on the scene, those beams
are cut at angles, and the cleanup crew hasn't gotten there yet ...

Regards,
JS

Thermite was not used for its ability to cause an explosion or to blow
the building apart it was used strickly because of its instantanious
cutting ability in incentarary devices and very quite no loud
explosions.

This is what NIST tried to pull off,to explain away the level of noise
needed to blow a building up. It only had to be loud enough to burn
the columns into! The sheeple swallowed the loud explosion part and
this fed their fancy.

If you quietly cut all the vertical support columns then a minor
explosion creating a jolt would set off the collapse!

Yeah, I see that has nothing to do with the angle of the cuts I was
explaining ... and, we need an independent investigation, not your opinions.

Regards,
JS