May 11th 11, 07:40 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,027
|
|
The few hundred years of climate data cannot possibly, andaccurately, model millions of years of actual climate ... DUH!
On May 11, 11:20*am, John Smith wrote:
On 5/11/2011 10:49 AM, joe wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:
On May 9, 10:02 pm, John *wrote:
On 5/9/2011 9:49 PM, hroedrank wrote:
...
Be its cigarette smoking, or co2 output, they both not politically
correct, and therefore on the left it's far too much to hope and assume
that an intelligent debate that puts the risk into reasonably
intelligent terms once again shows the dishonesty of the left and
socialists in this regards.
Super Turtle
Yeah, I think many toxins are hidden within the "toxic cigarette smoke"
verbiage ... now it will have to make room for the radiation coming from
Japan which we are still breathing and which will still be being created
for sometime to come as the nuclear plant continues releasing tremendous
quantities of deadly toxins to drift over here, to the USA.
Regards,
JS
This is BS. *This "scientist" does not even have the balls to use his
real name to stand behind his bogus assertion.
You fell for the action of a troll.
1) Take a thread that has morphed into something else. (This gives you a
subject)
2) Take a message from that thread and reply to it (this adds the the
'somebody wrote')
3) Delete all but a statement posted by someone else.
4) Add his own spin which is unrelated all of the above.
5) Post it to a bunch of groups unrelated to the original thread.
Super Turtle is probably not hroedrank and neither are the MIT Scientist.
|